| Advanced Administrative Law
(objectives)
1. Knowledge and ability to understand
The course aims to provide students with knowledge and understanding of the following profiles: the transformations linked to the management of migratory flows and the instruments for promoting administrative transparency
2. Ability to apply knowledge and understanding
At the end of the course, the student should be able to
- find a legislative or regulatory text, or an administrative act, analyse and interpret it through a correct identification of its rationale
- find and analyse, also critically, a jurisprudential decision of administrative judges and other Italian courts, as well as of the Court of Justice of the EU;
3. Autonomy of judgement
At the end of the course, the student must be able to analyse and reconstruct different and possibly alternative interpretative options with regard to a legal text or a judicial decision.
4. Communication skills
At the end of the course, the student should be able to illustrate the aspects mentioned in point 1 above.
5. Learning ability
At the end of the course, the student should be able to independently find and analyse legislation and case law in the field of administrative law.
|
|
Code
|
17747 |
|
Language
|
ITA |
|
Type of certificate
|
Profit certificate
|
|
Credits
|
9
|
|
Scientific Disciplinary Sector Code
|
IUS/10
|
|
Contact Hours
|
54
|
|
Type of Activity
|
Affini e ambito di sede classe LMG/01
|
|
Derived from
|
17831 Public Information Law in Political science, international security and public communication LM-62 R BONTEMPI VALERIO
(syllabus)
After a long wait, with Legislative Decree No. 97 of 25 May 2016, Italy has joined the many legal systems - there are over a hundred - that have equipped themselves with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), i.e. legislation that allows anyone to access non-confidential information held by public administrations. This legislation is important, because it transforms the knowability of that information from an exception into a rule, realises the principle of “total accessibility” previously only enunciated, and assigns public administrations a new task: to provide citizens with a real information service.
Nevertheless, the new rules on generalised civic access have been criticised for various reasons, from the excessive extension of exceptions to the overlap with the pre-existing forms of access, which survive, to the fragmentation of competences concerning the implementation phase. Comparison with other FOIA systems makes it possible to assess the consistency of these criticisms, to promote an informed scientific debate, and to identify solutions for a better implementation of this legislation.
(B.G. Mattarella e M. Savino (a cura di), L'accesso dei cittadini: esperienze di informazione amministrativa a confronto, Napoli, Editoriale scientifica, 2018)
(reference books)
B.G. Mattarella e M. Savino (a cura di), L'accesso dei cittadini: esperienze di informazione amministrativa a confronto, Napoli, Editoriale scientifica, 2018
|
|
Dates of beginning and end of teaching activities
|
From to |
|
Delivery mode
|
Traditional
|
|
Attendance
|
not mandatory
|
|
Evaluation methods
|
Oral exam
|
|
Teacher
|
RAMOTTI CAMILLA
(syllabus)
After a long wait, with Legislative Decree No. 97 of 25 May 2016, Italy has joined the many legal systems - there are over a hundred - that have equipped themselves with a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), i.e. legislation that allows anyone to access non-confidential information held by public administrations. This legislation is important, because it transforms the knowability of that information from an exception into a rule, realises the principle of “total accessibility” previously only enunciated, and assigns public administrations a new task: to provide citizens with a real information service.
Nevertheless, the new rules on generalised civic access have been criticised for various reasons, from the excessive extension of exceptions to the overlap with the pre-existing forms of access, which survive, to the fragmentation of competences concerning the implementation phase. Comparison with other FOIA systems makes it possible to assess the consistency of these criticisms, to promote an informed scientific debate, and to identify solutions for a better implementation of this legislation.
(B.G. Mattarella e M. Savino (a cura di), L'accesso dei cittadini: esperienze di informazione amministrativa a confronto, Napoli, Editoriale scientifica, 2018)
(reference books)
B.G. Mattarella e M. Savino (a cura di), L'accesso dei cittadini: esperienze di informazione amministrativa a confronto, Napoli, Editoriale scientifica, 2018
|
|
Dates of beginning and end of teaching activities
|
From to |
|
Delivery mode
|
Traditional
|
|
Attendance
|
not mandatory
|
|
Evaluation methods
|
Oral exam
|
|
|
