|
Teacher
|
SAVINO Mario
(syllabus)
The course examines the following aspects: the international protection regime, including the principle of non-refoulement and examples of protected entry procedures; the functioning of the Common European Asylum System, including criteria for distribution of responsibilities among member states, take-back procedures and relocation schemes; the EU Reception Conditions Directive and its implementation in the EU; the impact of the 2015 refugee crisis and the EU-Turkey agreement; how the issues of secondary movements and detention of asylum seekers are being addressed by the reform proposals at an advanced stage of negotiation (New EU Pact on Asylum and Migration); the temporary protection regime (implemented vis-à-vis Ukraine); and examples of integration strategies.
(reference books)
The oral exam will be based on the following readings:
1. Chapters 6 (Integration), 7 (The Common European Asylum System), 8 (Responsibility allocation and solidarity), 9 (Schengen and internal Border Controls) and 10 (Return and Readmission), in De Bruycker, De Somer, De Brouwer (eds), From Tampere 20 to Tampere 2.0. Towards a new European consensus on migration, 2019, p. 73-143.
2. E. Küçük, Temporary Protection Directive: Testing New Frontiers?, in European Journal of Migration and Law, 2023, pp. 1–30
3. M. Gkliati, The EU Returns Agency: The Commissions’ Ambitious Plans and Their Human Rights Implications, in European Journal of Migration and Law, 2022, pp. 545–569
4. D. Thym, Temporary Protection for Ukrainians: the Unexpected Renaissance of ‘Free Choice’, in EU Migration Law Blog, 2022, pp. 1-5
5. N. Feith Tan, Externalisation of asylum in Europe: Unpacking the UK-Rwanda Asylum Partnership Agreement, in EU Migration Law Blog, 2022, pp. 1-4
6. D. Thym, Secondary Movements: Overcoming the Lack of Trust among the Member States?, in EU Migration Law Blog, 2020, pp. 1-6
7. J. Vedsted-Hansen, Border Procedure: Efficient Examination or Restricted Access to Protection?, in EU Migration Law Blog, 2020, pp. 1-6
8. Boldizsár Nagy, A – pyrrhic? – victory concerning detention in transit zones and procedural rights: FMS & FMZ and the legislation adopted by Hungary in its wake, in EU Migration Law Blog, 2020, pp. 1-5
9. M. Savino, On failed relocation and would-be Leviathans: Towards the New Pact on Migration and Asylum, in ADiM Blog, 2020, pp. 1-8
10. F. Maiani, Hotspots and Relocation Schemes: the right therapy for the Common European Asylum System?, in EU Migration Law Blog, 2016, pp. 1-4
|
